Replies to post #54338 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[dr frudaky]

chiggah

Please refrain from childish personal attacks simply because you do not agree with what is being posted. This is a fine forum for discussing and sharing opposing views. You must learn to keep your emotions under control, even if you truly believe the huge amount of money which you have already lost on paper in this investment will be irretrievably lost because of those opposing views. It is a free country with free speech. You cannot put a price on or limit that freedom!

JMHO for your immediate compliance.

dr f

[bag8ger]

Chiggah,

Frog lets his hatred of Dr Frudakis color his every post with respect to his analysis or description of the science.

He will tell us, for example, we can't patent SNP's, and creates the impression that that includes all SNP's. Then we find that even an individual SNP, if it had a specific utility, can be, let alone groups of them such as AIM's which he has said we can't patent, which W2P refuted recently.

He tried to convince us that SNP value was a thing of the past with the 'new' old discoveries of CNV's (sp), but fails to explain that if SNP's are so inadequate how is it that Ancestry works so well.

Too, people who call other people liars with the frequency he does, usually see that fault in themselves and try to direct attention onto others by falsely accusing them. Pity!

[frogdreaming]

chiggah, What are you babbling about?

But I will take the word of the company over yours anyday,..

This discussion is not between me and the company, it is between me and bag8ger. And regardless of who you would prefer to support, it is I who am explaining exactly what the company said!

It is bag8ger who is misrepresenting it.

Nice try. Now go back to sleep. Your knee jerk need for me to be wrong is making you look stupid....as usual.