InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

chemist72

02/02/21 11:15 AM

#40094 RE: MattyBS #40093

As I understand it, Schatzi "explores" for gold for their clients.

In that case, Schatzi wouldn't own any of the gold in the ground. Only their clients would own that gold.

So what assets exactly does Schatzi own? Maybe the intellectual rights to their One Step Process?
icon url

Squirrely_McShitty

02/02/21 11:21 AM

#40095 RE: MattyBS #40093

And therein lies the entire problem...One can't "know what one owns" if one does not know what one owns.
icon url

SaidTheTurkey

02/02/21 11:35 AM

#40097 RE: MattyBS #40093

If the underlying exploration capabilities of Schatzi were being RM'd to STHC instead of Ameca Mining, why would STHC be taking the place of Ameca Mining on the front page of their website? Also, that would be a complete 180 of everything Mark has released of their intentions to RM parts of Ameca's business into STHC.

Most of the ideas being circulated around here that don't have much substance and next to no evidence are those that are downplaying the momentum and strengthening ties between Ameca and STHC. However the site update is just providing a clearer picture that everyone here has been expecting. I sincerely don't get your logic, but comments below this are already hopping onto it as a sort of proof of doubt, which it obviously isn't.
icon url

Trillioninvesting

02/02/21 1:43 PM

#40108 RE: MattyBS #40093

Ameca mining is merging into STHC
icon url

Zimpel

02/02/21 8:56 PM

#40144 RE: MattyBS #40093

Considering that Exploration is a "5 step process" per Schatzi website and Ameca mining are steps 3,4,5 it stands to reason that Ameca and Schatzi are both necessary for any project. It is hard to imagine one without the other whatever is merged will receive a much fairer evaluation that reflects this point.
icon url

power_surge

02/02/21 10:27 PM

#40151 RE: MattyBS #40093

Why do you think we’d get that instead of Ameca?