Overwhelmingly most of the US freezes each year - clearly. How does any Gen-X device possibly work with catalysts immersed in water which changes the opacity (water to ice) to sunlight to ZERO! That means the catalyst cannot see the sunlight and function while frozen. It cannot work while frozen! So not only does the technology produce very little hydrogen in sunlight (months without freezing) it can NOT produce hydrogen in the months where, according to the "weather service map", it freezes outdoors. (What can possibly prevent the device from destruction in the expansion of the contained water freezing into ice?) Unpublished and unverified indoor lab results of the hyped up HYSR tech have no relationship with actual outdoor yearly conditions. One must notice that HYSR (Tim Young) never brings this up or has research results for this area of thermodynamic concern!
Amorphous solar panels, the least efficient, are at best 10% efficient! Call a legitimate solar panel dealer and have them explain solar panels to you.
The best catalyst coating efficiency is ~10% (and decays) and is published data from others using the platinum+ "other" catalysts used. They have actually published the numbers where HYSR has NEVER done so.
So at best, NO OPINION, you get (ref the map ) US average 4.5kwh/m2/day X .1 X .1 which gives you 0.045 kwh/m2/day to break water's hydrogen bonds (average US insolation). HINT, CLUE, that is a really small amount of energy.
Where is the OPINION in that? Your quote:
"Ill debate you anytime mister, BRING ALONG ALL THE NUMBERS AND FACTS YOU HAVE AVAILABLE, I'll be ready!"
There are the numbers, I brought it so fulfill your claim!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
