Replies to post #211344 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)

[arachnodude]

You're mistaking business proof with scientific proof.

The only proof KBLB needs from a business standpoint is that Spider Silk works the way the customer wants it to work. Although, scientific proof makes it an easier sell. But, KBLB only has to scientifically prove it works to customers requesting it. Once the product is in use by an end customer and the qualities and performance are on display, the need for scientific proof fades considerably after that.

I get what you're saying, in theory, but in reality KBLB can sustain business without scientific proof. I wouldn't worry about that scenario, though, as it is obvious Mr. T is shooting for both, commercialization and scientific verification. It just so happens he can commercialize his products without the latter. Good for us shareholders! Even better will be when the "scientific proof" backs the product!

DROP-IN AND GO KBLB! HOLDING THE GOLDEN!!!

[rayovac812]

presents a fine line, when it comes to the term "conflict of interest."

Why? The SEC and shareholders know the plan. It has been made public in PR and filings. The weightier motivation is his 200+ million shares being increasingly valuable. I want the same thing. There is no fine line, get this train moving. If it were a fine line, the SEC, Maxim, and shareholders can step up or walk away. Anyone can invent any issue they please, but there is simply no problem funding public or private companies this way. I am very pleased he is doing it. With his own money or by selling some shares he owns to lend the company money. It is a perfectly viable, legal, and moral effort.

Everyone sees the effort he is making, and most are applauding.

Third party verification was a must, when Malcolm Fraser was part of the team...

Again this is his call and no one elses. The goal is 3rd party verification by customers, at this point. That should be proof enough for anyone.