Once again with the psychobabble...
There is nothing emotional about my argument what so ever. Women cannot be the sole foundation of creation. As far as I know I have yet to hear of one producing offspring asexually. Without mans donation the female creates useless eggs.
Men as possessors imply subjugation and could not be further from the truth. Despite the vessel in which the creation is carried the man has still participated in the creation and thus is a mutual ‘possessor’ of that creation. Unlike popular belief possession is not 9/10ths of the law.
This is where you and I differ in beliefs and instead of simply agreeing to disagree you try slapping me with Freudian psychoanalysis as a way to discredit my argument. This method is extremely dishonest and as of yet you have not claimed a degree in psychology so you really have neither credibility nor authority in making your tabletop diagnosis.
If this is where you're going I'll let you fantasize about cocaine, and sex with your mother alone, thank you very much. As for me, I think Freud was a fraud.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
