Isn’t that nice, there’s no rush take the entire quarter after missing Q4. Leo the snake enjoys no pressure as he’s being paid while shareholders bleed dry.
... lots of speculation on the Trials...as to where IPIX is and what has been done and/or when...and on a totally as separate matter, the speculation on the drug source of reported Russian (alleged)"antidote".
IMO..."controlled release" of info is intentional.
I prefer the dribble of PRs as events happen in real time... But, there are those shorts who take advantage of short PR's, twist them and/or intentionally undermine them, questioning why there is not more information (in the form of Strawman questions) especially from this board (though I am told he does not read)...It's easier to question and dance on a short PR. I am not implying that is the reason, but perhaps Leo is looking at the most "impactful" PR to form a tapestry of Brilacidin's value.
IMO...bigger things and players are likely in play, as has been referenced in prior PRs and might be considered in the roll out of PRs. The Question of whether IPIX has received a CTA from an "overseas" eastern Europe country (Russia, as discussed here before)...is an interesting one. "Overseas" jurisdictions are said to be easier (bureaucratically) than U.S. FDA, and it was reported in PR we got the IND/FDA. Also consider that the company isn't required to report everything as it happens...I believe it has 21 days to report such an event. So has it happened? Has 21 days passed?
Few would dispute that "now" is optimum time, and should be for several months, for recruiting CV trial candidates EVERYWHERE in the world...IPIX/CRO is or will likely have an easy time lining up sites previously screened, recruiting the candidates (if it has not already been completed).
I could see Leo waiting on reporting events (within 21 days of occurance if he lining up all completed thresholds he wants to accomplish for B, for its next phase of development, while he/CROs line up Covid-19 CT (and the other indications progress, which have been alluded to in previous PRs) on which he indicated he wanted Brilacidin to move forward.
IMO...in the next one to three (several) weeks we should see Brilacidin will blow away the competition as a Therapeutic ...at which point IMO IPIX should start going beyond the "serious look" phase to "serious actionable interest" phase by BP especially if we get, as cited in previous RP, movement on Brilacidin for the other indications PR'd (OM and UC.)
Perhaps the plan is letting it all rip at once with a MOA PR's...as there appears to be a lot that is or could be happening!
IMO, speculation about the Russian alleged "antidote"...as being Brilacidin...is likely misguided. As noted by others...the PR references the Russian gov. as "developing" the "antidote", (imo best they could be doing is to make a feeble attempt to take credit for Brilacidin...post trials..LOL) But, imo, even more misguided is believing they have one, or one that is 99% effective (or even 10%) effective. https://112.international/russia/russia-promises-to-present-covid-19-antidote-57775.html.
If we look at the Sputnik vaccine "success" we can likely guess what the truth success of the supposed "Antidote" is and will be.
My personal GP happened to graduate from a major State Medical University which is a top medical university in Russia. https://fmsmu.com/about-university/...he has had conversations with some former colleagues in the hospitals...and told that the vaccine wards are empty. Few are taking it...few believe it works... It appears that is so because there is likely no anecdotal (or credible scientific) evidence in the street.
Some further interesting development there is that Russia has been accused of underreporting cases and deaths by 2/3rds of official report...meaning they are 200% more or 3x that which has been reported...sounds like a crisis greater than the U.S and China (under-reporting by 10X).
Know what you own!
ps...before it is raised here...regarding credibility of "overseas" Clinical Trials..(from prior conversations with a 20+ year research MD who has run extensive overseas trials for 4 BP) it was explained that when internationally reputable CRO's supervise and run trials the "overseas gov." or the site hospital staff do not control the trial...they "facilitate" the order under direct supervision of and chain of custody controls by CROs ...identifying the right patients, using the equipment specified and sending it to and receiving it at the site etc is all controlled by CRO. Those CRO's establish the integrity of the trial...if they screw up...they don't get paid...a good incentive for getting it done right!
Full disclosure...I don't flip nor sell. I just add with each PR or as SP opportunities present itself.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
