He just explained to you the entire story of the components, which was that the Purchaser wanted assurances they would be available, then later decided they didn’t want or need them after all.
You are repeating language from a prior communication that was then replaced with facts for what actually happened later. I know you prefer the earlier communication about the components. I know you also prefer the initial estimated value of the assets. But then the SISP failed, the liquidation happened and the actual results displayed publicly. That’s the end.