LOL don't confuse blind speculation with a suspicion derived from facts!
My saying: "I'm thinkin' that papa Steve used some of what he sold to pay off the Maas case settlement. Timing of his first sale was no coincidence. LYIN' Greg drug Vystar into the case by having Vystar pay his legal bills."
Is based on the FACTS that LYIN' Greg & Vystar lost the Maas case and a settlement needed to be paid at the time of papa Steve's first sale of VYST stock. Vystar wasn't even involved in this case until it was discovered that Vystar was covering legal expenses for this case. That is when Vystar and the entire BOD was added to the case. All the court docs. are available for reading on PACER.
This never should have happened! WHY was Vystar paying legal expenses for a case that they weren't involved in??
How did the BOD allow this? Guess no one was watching who company checks were being written to!
Blind speculation would be something more along the lines of: VYST Confirms Nearly a Billion in Revenues...
Vystar has done no such thing! Yet that silly conjecture was taken hook, line & sinker as undeniable Gospel.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
