Replies to post #198265 on OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp (OWCP)

[I-Glow]

Then provide proof the following happened:

"The books were asked to be open because the company made a proposal to DGF to take control of the company."

You don't have any proof this statement is true - the history of Turner suggests that is completely fabricated.

Post your DD on how you verified the tall tales of Turner are true.

Why did Turner allow the domain to expire - what part of his grand Master plan did this benefit shareholders?

IG

[I-Glow]

Yes, DGF is a toxic lender - but that isn't germane to the conversation - no one forced OWCP to sign the promissory note and in New York there isn't any usury laws for corporate to corporate lending.

I told everyone at the time that it was a toxic loan - but as usual most defended the OWCP scammers.

OWCP is hiding more fiscal irresponsibility than DGF.

Turner is lying about requesting DGF to open their books - but OWCP will be forced to open their books in the bankruptcy.

IG