InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PennyWorld

12/12/20 7:41 PM

#32252 RE: biglued1 #32251

I think the point of the nurse's comment is that there are no long term studies of the impact that this new technology has on the human body. There are many unknowns with this new technology. I for one will wait a few months to observe the impact on the general population before I take that needle. Eventually I'll take the needle if all goes well.
icon url

JTORENCE

12/13/20 8:08 AM

#32258 RE: biglued1 #32251

'biglued1 I agree totally. I posted the link in reply to a poster. The statement (in bold) were his words not mine.
icon url

goodietime

12/13/20 9:56 AM

#32259 RE: biglued1 #32251

"IMO....that’s complete & udder BS. Sounds like a bunch of anti-vaxers. Name just one vaccine and in the history of vaccines that has “‘messed with the DNA messaging?”

imo, That is because this one is a DIFFERENT type of vaccine.

Usual vaccines use dead cells of the illness, which then cause an antibody response from your body to fight it.

This 'DNA messaging' vaccine, from my understanding, goes TO YOUR DNA, and ALTERS IT, to make certain antibodies. There are no 'dead illness cells' injected.

Next time you take your car to the shop, have the mechanic add a few miscellaneous parts to the engine. See how that will work out for you.