InvestorsHub Logo

sctts

12/10/20 7:50 PM

#63753 RE: Goldenboy17 #63750

Sounds like a Stern Castle Post!!

Tigerdave

12/10/20 7:51 PM

#63754 RE: Goldenboy17 #63750

Very logical deduction. IMO

basserdan

12/10/20 10:13 PM

#63759 RE: Goldenboy17 #63750

<<<The PR says "large concentration", "concentrated" and "compact" to describe this new area. So, we have a large variety of artifacts in a compact, concentrated area from a colonial era vessel that "came to rest on the ocean floor.">>>

The PR did not say there was a "large" variety, Goldenboy... only that the variety "includes standing rigging, ships fittings, rope and wood fragments."

That may very well be all there is down there in that particular "compact, concentrated area."

Raider21

12/11/20 8:48 AM

#63773 RE: Goldenboy17 #63750

Quote: If the SeaSearcher found this wreck or they have a least scanned the area (surely they have) then it should be telling them what is below the upper deck. I would think if the wreck went down intact and slowly 'decayed', the first thing they would come across is the upper deck material. Which would then need to be reported to FBAR and PR'd to the public. So far, so good.
__________________________

Incredible how people with no experience can make assumptions that are if anything, very misleading. If what you're assuming was anywhere near true, then the flotsam that you presume to be a shipwreck certainly isn't the 1715 Concepcion which violently hit a shoal off Cape Canaveral and broke apart. That's fact based upon archival research. What is your assumption based on?