I don't believe that is accurate. The default judgment establishes liability. Upon the default judgment being granted, the judge ordered an evidentiary hearing on damages. There was nothing in the order that ordered the turnover. Therefore, how are you concluding that? I am reading the order dated 2-28-2020
I also add that the Judgment as a Matter if Law dated 2-28-2020 only stated that specific performance AND Incidental damages were both available as a remedy. Read the meat of the order on Page 6. It does not order the turnover. That order is also dated 2-28-2020. Think about it another way. If you are correct, why would GDSI and their attorneys wait 10 months to seize the company. The judge has never ordered the turnover.