Replies to post #31687 on Relief Therapeutics Holding AG (RLFTF)

[Dash82]

Looks like it’s been fixed now. I can confirm on first reading the article this morning that they referred to it as a vaccine not just once, but many times.

[elllk]

When I posted the article and a bit later posted a quote from it this was what it said:

My post:

At the very end of the article Woodun does say:

Finally, Relief has a strong vaccine candidate based on the fact that it uses VIP, which was present in significantly higher levels in the blood samples of those patients who did NOT die because of respiratory failure.

In response to your post I looked back again and it has been changed to:

Finally, Relief has a strong drug candidate based on the fact that it uses VIP, which was present in significantly higher levels in the blood samples of those patients who did NOT die because of respiratory failure.

So it has obviously been corrected. I wasn't sure why he brought in the vaccine reference when I read it and I posted it only to point out that statement was in there as some indicated. I didn't post it because I agreed with him. I did wonder if he would elaborate on that at some future time but now it is clear that comment was a mistake.