Yeah, I figure they could care less about whether their actions stimulated folks to buy more at year end. All they were trying to do, IMHO, was forestall an end of year "crash" as people who had held for a long time decided to sell their BIGN to take the loss to offset gains elsewhere in their portfolios. I was watching for a selloff to begin once people got their divy and the selling this week in BIGN is what happens once folks have booked their divy. So, the decision on everyone's brain is whether to take a loss now and use the proceeds (such as they are... diminished considerably) for something else or to hold on. The BOD caused people to hesitate and now fewer (probably) will bail. Now that its too late to take the tax loss, the size of the down swoop is probably reduced. The year end tax incentive of the loss was cleverly addressed by the divy. So, the size of the stock price swoon is probably going to be less pronounced than it would have been had they not announced the divy. In essence, the divy at that time of year was a defensive move and a rather well thought out one at that. It caused likely year end sellers to hesitate, which was all the BOD really wanted. I think it reveals that they are sensitive to not have their stock price go subpenny. I bet they have a PR or two cued up and loaded, ready to release to rescue a subpenny move, should it begin to occur. They probably would prefer to have the LOI close and release one massive PR, but they'll also probably trot out a PR or two on stuff they know will be modestly favorably received if it looks like sub-pennyland is imminent. That IMHO. of course.
In any event, if the divy acts like Tyche seems to be trending to do, then the shares from the divy will be worth a bunch once they pass out from restriction. Just my opinion, mind you.
GLTA
Imperial Whazoo