InvestorsHub Logo

Tiger Money

11/27/20 1:58 AM

#31472 RE: J-Belfort #31470

While I agree it is a dumb move, i can't disagree with a lot of what he/she is saying. Does the company even have an IR person? If so, I would love to talk to him/her about RLFTF. In all seriousness, someone please share the contact information.

In addition to not having an IR person, poor Dr. J has to sit through these awful interviews that have no impact nor will they ever on selling this company to investors. instead they just keep laying low and diluting. there is no doubt the company is run poorly. again, i think a lot of what that investor or investor group is saying is true.

the company should be out on a road show as a way to get around washington's attempt to sweep this proven medicine under the rug. otherwise, it isn't going anywhere. sometimes it isn't a bad idea to light a fire cracker management's arses to get them moving and to provide shareholder value. they have a very easy job as they have the product but perhaps that is the problem in itself. perhaps they think the medicine and stock will sell itself. trust me, it would if anyone knew about it. sadly enough investors don't, nor will they, until management starts taking their responsibility more seriously. hell, they want a raise in two weeks... why? they haven't done jack shi$

LJ-Bodhi

11/27/20 1:59 AM

#31474 RE: J-Belfort #31470

It is astounding how the internet has emboldened these voices of dissent. They have maybe a $5k or $10k position on a billion dollar company and access to a message board. No first hand knowledge. No info on what is happening behind the scenes. Nothing to add but anger and vitriol. Yes, their history is written. This company has done it ALL by the book and is doing ALL it can to get regulatory approval in a pandemic. Their progress and communication on that progress is admirable. Thank you JB for adding your voice of reason to the unnecessary dissent.

If you don't believe in the company, sell and move on. You will not convince the investors of your shortsighted views and we are not interested in converting you. Just move on.

Vanilla Fitbit

11/27/20 2:15 AM

#31479 RE: J-Belfort #31470

Letter sent to RLF...

I’m sure I’m suspect #1 for being the Author, I want everyone to know i was not involved in any way.

I do however agree with most of the content, as it is TRUE!

I don’t think the letter was threatening... It read more like a statement of facts.

I mean let’s be honest... they have Generated zero public awareness of RLF.

The manufacturing question, and refusal to answer was interesting considering that we have been told
150,000 does By Jan (and whatever that 30,000 number was) The communication on this front has been confusing at best.

I actually think they are doing a very good job at PR, but horrible job at Media exposure .

PR and Media exposure are two VERY different things..

While corporate PR will at times generate media exposure, Media exposure is a solely different item utilized to generate public awareness of product (RLF) this is what you see EVERY OTHER company doing when they go on REAL media outlets (Fox News, CNBC, CNN and the like) . Apparently these companies are not shackled by the same “regulatory requirements” as RT for some unknown reason. Which oddly must have been instituted against RT after their ONLY real media exposure on Aug 6th Fox News Neil Cavuto. (Ram interview)

Media exposure also generates NEW INVESTOR DOLLARS!!! Hmmmmmm wouldn’t that be great!!!

So yes PR (news releases) they are doing great
Media exposure SEVERELY LACKING!!!!

But again, while I agree with the text, I wasn’t part of it.

I do think these are important subjects to breach as they are now asking us to vote to give them MASSIVE raises and also availability to dilute our shares yet again.

cybermich

11/27/20 2:43 AM

#31483 RE: J-Belfort #31470

This seems pretty straight forward to me.

Usually a company gets in trouble for over hyping or over promoting (not under promoting)..

I can understand the frustration towards a system which seems to be crawling at a snails pace.. but that (imo) is not the fault of rlftf management..

granted, there could be a counter measure chosen in which the company tried to put pressure either directly or indirectly (promotion) to get the system to move quicker..

but imo that decision could potentially back fire..

better (imo) for the company to focus on the science and communication with its shareholders.. some things are out of the company's control.

Now if we were to get just a little more "promotion" I wouldn't argue:)

but there seems to be a better way to go about this than threatening litigation.

We should see a lot more movement (again imo) once we finish enrollment.

Which should be any day now.

Frizzizle

11/27/20 3:19 AM

#31489 RE: J-Belfort #31470

Honestly the letter is a little aggressive but it’s never a bad thing to put a bug in public relations ear

chingis

11/27/20 3:32 AM

#31494 RE: J-Belfort #31470

I am lost for words by this conduct. I seriously doubt whether these people are even shareholders, I suspect they may have been rounded up by some form of malicious ambulance chaser.
As if the company didn't have enough on its hands they have to incur expense and dedicate resources to respond to this sort of garbage.

whosjohngalt

11/27/20 7:46 AM

#31501 RE: J-Belfort #31470

good grief

there is stupid and then there are levels beyond that that make me embarrassed to admit I'm included in the thinking mammal species of the human race.

best

Spikedog

11/27/20 7:51 AM

#31502 RE: J-Belfort #31470

I agree 100%.

mastonvm

11/27/20 10:04 AM

#31506 RE: J-Belfort #31470

Beau Corell would be the guy who wrote this... he is a member of the RLF Facebook group.

go_wamu

11/28/20 7:13 AM

#31569 RE: J-Belfort #31470

Again refering the letter of 11/10/2020.
The 25 signatories admit they are shareholders, but might have no idea about the stock exchange.
Look at the date of the letter. On that day, the PPS hit its lowest level in months (around $ 0.27) and these gamblers were certainly in the red. But instead of getting a low average by re-buying, they preferred to complain. They would certainly be back in the profit zone today.
IMO, it is better for them to run away and sell their RLFTF-shares. If they are members of the RLF Facebook group, then it would also be possible that they were instigated for this action and possibly paid also.
Whatever was the reason for their comments, they only made me smile tired.
https://imgur.com/a/vUCAOEK