Letter sent to RLF...
I’m sure I’m suspect #1 for being the Author, I want everyone to know i was not involved in any way.
I do however agree with most of the content, as it is TRUE!
I don’t think the letter was threatening... It read more like a statement of facts.
I mean let’s be honest... they have Generated zero public awareness of RLF.
The manufacturing question, and refusal to answer was interesting considering that we have been told
150,000 does By Jan (and whatever that 30,000 number was) The communication on this front has been confusing at best.
I actually think they are doing a very good job at PR, but horrible job at Media exposure .
PR and Media exposure are two VERY different things..
While corporate PR will at times generate media exposure, Media exposure is a solely different item utilized to generate public awareness of product (RLF) this is what you see EVERY OTHER company doing when they go on REAL media outlets (Fox News, CNBC, CNN and the like) . Apparently these companies are not shackled by the same “regulatory requirements” as RT for some unknown reason. Which oddly must have been instituted against RT after their ONLY real media exposure on Aug 6th Fox News Neil Cavuto. (Ram interview)
Media exposure also generates NEW INVESTOR DOLLARS!!! Hmmmmmm wouldn’t that be great!!!
So yes PR (news releases) they are doing great
Media exposure SEVERELY LACKING!!!!
But again, while I agree with the text, I wasn’t part of it.
I do think these are important subjects to breach as they are now asking us to vote to give them MASSIVE raises and also availability to dilute our shares yet again.