So...are you officially admitting you cannot provide a single shred of a mention of a second deal after the failure of the SISP? Since we all know that’s a “yes”, is that not an admission, however painful, that this is over?
Still you have no proof of a second transaction or even a mention of one by the judges or monitors after the SISP failed lol. If you even had a shred of proof you would have responded with it LMFAO