InvestorsHub Logo

BigE1960

11/15/20 9:45 AM

#95654 RE: Jamis1 #95652

This is the conversation.

1/4 false negatives is not sufficient accuracy for health status assurance such as QDXHID

Kurt_Banoffee

11/15/20 2:05 PM

#95661 RE: Jamis1 #95652

I’ve been reading for weeks and when you see arguments in the articles about accuracy they seem to all just want to complain about the fact that some will be missed instead of focusing on the fact additional testing can help reduce transmission rate.



That's because there is fundamental disconnect in understanding between (1) what QDXHID is - assurance, and (2) and what are the goals of mass surveillance testing - removing as many infectious people from the population to quarantine as efficiently as possible.

It's not complaining. It's pointing out a critical FACT. It may sound like complaining to someone letting a bias get in the way of the FACTS.