InvestorsHub Logo

Evil Rabbit

10/28/20 1:19 PM

#126877 RE: TheBioTechG #126876

I think this 2.25-2.40 range is the bottom. Any fence sitters who don't buy back in here stand to miss the ride IMO.

Saltz

10/28/20 1:20 PM

#126880 RE: TheBioTechG #126876

Well said Bio. I respect Nader’s passion and drive. He also delivered us Longs from the sub .30 SP to a very nice gain even at today’s SP. We are now at a new level of expectations w a much broader base of SH’s. That’s a good thing.

I’ll stop right there and keep my word from my previous post.

GLTU Bio.

PSea

10/28/20 7:20 PM

#126937 RE: TheBioTechG #126876

LOL. What has he done?

No approvals. One BLA submission rejected. another that has been shelved for 2 years. Poor data for receptor occupancy. No timeline for FDA resubmission. No EUA. Not even a clear path forward as far as trial priorities. He didn't share any of the interim data despite dangling it for months. Enrollment is anemic. He gets paid a disgusting sum yet complains about how hard they're working AND COMPLETELY HOODWINKED INVESTORS WHEN THEY DIDN'T FULLY DISCLOSE THE TRUE INTENTIONS W/ THE AUTHORIZED SHARES. Amarex, imo, has been an utter failure at every stage. He sold the bulk of his stock while telling everyone else it was worth triple digits. he's "signed" two covid distribution agreements, none of which generated any cash to the company and he's miserably failed securing an uplisting. And he's apparently screwed one of the foremost authorities on this area of science, BP. ...but he sure talks a good game.

he's run one under powered mild/moderate trial and one under powered severe/critical trial. neither of which have been good enough to terminate trials and garner EUA. neither will capture viral load (see regeneron's PR today. apparently, they thought it was a worthy metric as do i).

from my perspective, all he's done is get paid a disgusting sum not tied to any significant milestones. good deal for him.