Replies to post #63303 on Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[monkeybusiness]

Tigerdave, thanks for the recap and sharing previous DD on Seafarer. It appears the Seasearcher is hot on the trail of good things for shareholders.

[hedge_fun]

Recovery? Recovery of what? The BS-ometer is.....

going haywire. And the sheep think Tinkerbell 2.0 is going to locate the motherlode and they'll start bringing treasure on deck immediately. They can't recovery anything as the reports shows, as well as the permit itself and SEC filings.

The report also shows these clowns are NOT very productive. I'm sure the sheep don't care, they just look forward to the next paid promo.

Perform Archaeological Sensitive Recovery

Amusing.

This is from Area 1's latest report obtained from the Bureau.

Archaeological Fieldwork.

Seafarer’s Quest, LLC, working under the 1A-31 permit undertook investigations sensitive to the nature of underwater finds and also the idea of in situ preservation. All objects located have been left in situ as required by the permit and their nature (“modern” or “potentially historical’), identification (if available), tag number (if applicable) and location was recorded on the daily field logs which are included as part of
this final report.

This is how many days they have worked since they obtained the permit for Area 1 in July 2016. Remember, less than 2 weeks AFTER they received the permit for Area 1, Kyle proclaimed they were on the wreck. Let's see if the report mentions a wreck and/or recovery.

Target Investigation: July 6, 2016 to Jan. 5, 2017

From July to Dec 2016, Seafarer’s Quest LLC investigated magnetic anomalies on site MB514, a site suspected to hold the remains of an historic period shipwreck. Seafarer’s Quest at this time employed 3
vessels for this effort, the main vessel of Seafarer’s Quest, MV Iron Maiden, the No Limit and the Shaakrig.

During this reporting period there were 8 days spent on site. Anomaly investigations in area 1 were focused around the previously identified wooden features; Table 3, Page 34. A total of 30 of the 34 priority targets; Figure 12, Page 98, were investigated. Out of the 30 investigated targets 14 were identified as “No Find.

The research vessels were manned by dive teams with a primary mission to investigate anomalies through diver reconnaissance using the circle search and hand fanning methodologies discussed previously.

The Melbourne Shoreline (MS) Survey was conducted in accordance with the “Archeological Guidelines for Remote Sensing Survey Work of an Exploration Permit Area” on September 19 through 21, 2016 and identified 518 anomalies within the Survey Area; Figure 13, Page 99. A comparison of the MS Survey; Table 8, Page 57 and the prior HTQ turnover surveys within the same area was conducted and any anomalies from prior surveys not reflected in the MS survey were removed from the priority listing and from the Chart; Table 9, Page 69. Any anomalies that had been identified prior to the survey were retained as well as noted with the additional survey data. Any targets listed as “No Find” within the new survey area were removed from the chart but retained on all diving records.

Target Investigation: Jan 6 to July 5, 2017

During this reporting period there were 14 days spent on site. A total of 32 targets were investigated within the Priority Target Area; Dive Record Jan – Jul 2017, Table 10, Page 75. Out of the 32 targets 15 targets were identified as modern and 17 were listed as “No Find” which were reported on our Daily Field Reports and filed with the State. The research vessels were manned by dive teams with a primary mission to investigate anomalies through diver reconnaissance using the circle search and hand fanning methodologies discussed previously.

Target Investigation: July 6, 2017 to Jan 5, 2018
During this reporting period, 11 days were spent on site. Site work was limited due to weather in which several major storms (hurricanes) tracked along the eastern coast of Florida and the US. The investigations centered on an area between the two HTQ Theorized debris trails; Figure 14, Page 100. This area was selected due to its large collection of magnetic anomalies. A total of 22 targets were investigated within the target area. Out of the 22 targets 7 targets were identified as historical (spikes), 4 targets were identified as modern and 11 were listed as “No Find” which were reported on our Daily Field Reports and filed with the State.

The 7 targets that were identified as historical (spikes) were A-325, A-331, MB601, A-41, MB603, MB611, and A-49. All spikes remain “In Situ”.

The research vessels were manned by dive teams with a primary mission to investigate anomalies through diver reconnaissance using the circle search and hand fanning methodologies discussed previously.

Target Investigation: Jan 6 to July 5, 2018

During this reporting period, 16 days were spent on site. A total of 34 targets were investigated within the Priority Target Area; Dive Record Jan – Jul 2018, Table 11, Page 76. Out of the 35 targets investigated, 17 were identified as modern, 16 were listed as “No Find” and 1 was determined as historical. The historical material was Target A-626, where 3 iron encrusted objects. Due to the very limited visibility, the items were temporally taken to the surface, photographed, and returned to their originating location. All three items remain In-Situ at this time.

During this period, while investigating Target MS-422, the target location was identified, however divers were not able to locate the item due to its depth in the terrain which was loose sand. After reviewing the survey data, and confirming the item had a large Dipole Gamma signature (nT 136), the decision was made to use propwash deflection. Using only one blower, sand was displaced in controlled layers of about 2 feet at a time. After each period of propwash, divers were sent to investigate the depth and determine if any object(s) had been uncovered. Upon reaching a depth of 8-feet, the object was identified as an automotive transmission. Due to the location of the area investigated the displaced sand was quickly filled in by the current and wash from the swells. Dive Record Jul 2014 – Jul 2018; Table 12, Page 77.

Target Investigation: July 6 to Jan 5, 2019

During this reporting period, 6 days were spent on site. A total of 18 targets were investigated within the Priority Target Area; Dive Record Jul – Jan 2019, Table 13, Page 78. The investigation efforts were hindered by storms within the region. From July to Nov there were 8 named storms that influenced diving conditions one of which, Hurricane Leslie, impacted the sea state for 24 days. No additional historical material was identified during this period.

Target Investigation: Jan 6 to Feb 5, 2019

During this reporting period, Seafarer Quest was unable to investigate only two targets with in the area due to sea and weather conditions. These targets were 804 and A219. The diver investigation reported both targets as “No Find” due to extremely poor visibility. Both targets have been logged as to return to targets at a later date when visibility improves.

Target Investigation: Mar 1 to Aug 1, 2019

During this reporting period, 18 days were spent on site. A total of 24 targets were investigated within the Priority Target Area; Dive Records Mar – Aug 2019, Table 14, Page 79. Of the 24 targets investigated, 16 were new target investigations and 8 had been previously investigated. Of the 16 new targets investigated, 9 were “No Finds”, 5 were “Modern” in nature, and 2 were “Historic” in nature in that they appeared to be iron spikes. A magnetometer survey was conducted on one day and four days were spent setting up the SeaSearcher® Verification Test Range which is outlined in section F. Archaeological Results and Conclusions, New Investigative Technology, Page 41.

There is no recovery within state waters.

Maybe the worm poop wreck will be fruitful.