I don't want to get into the blame game. Personally, I want something that will help us retail shareholders. My own opinion, FWIW, is that if the facts are as I assumed in my prior post, I suspect that Steve is in there as deep as Petar. It's just my opinion though and not worth any more than what it is.
Personally, I think that's good because "the more the merrier." If retail shareholders are to get some relief, it will be good if all those who benefited have to disgorge or otherwise perform as they promised in their public communications.
Again, just my opinion.