"Is this a situation where an antibody like Lenz could have helped the outcome?"
I don't have a science background, but I have observations from my wife's case, which include a background of cancer, radiation, chemo, and surgery.
The day after the PET/CT scans, which showed a complete response, yet the patient required hospitalization immediately thereafter, he was already presenting with signs of some type of encephalopathy, which was the short-term memory loss, confusion, and obtundation, leading to intubation. I don't know if this happened as a toxic side effect of CTX-110, or not. If so, we ought to be looking at Crispr in terms of being used as a co-therapy with their product, as we are with Kite/Gilead.
But those are symptoms which I think could have been alleviated with lenz.
The problem in this case, for the doctors and oncologists to study, is the febrile neutropenia. Lenz works on shutting down the over-production of white blood cells. This patient suffered by a low white blood cell count.
Would it have been effective once the patient was found to have reactivated HHV-6 encephalitis, in combination with the anti-viral therapy that was then administered?
In a broader sense, my question is how do we ensure that lenz doesn't deprive patients of the white blood cells they need, in our quest to prevent the over-production of those white blood cells?