Replies to post #124700 on Cytodyn Inc (CYDY)

[Latane]

Saltz, would you unblind then and try to shop the results? Or is it a better risk to go to 75%. Perhaps we will get an answer during the CC. If time and money are our primary risks, perhaps it is better to unblind. If that doesn’t work, then you can focus solely on HIV and stop wasting both time and money.

[EponymousKook]

In my opinion, the SP reflects the *potential*, not the risk.

Before Nader put the majority of the CYDY eggs in the Covid basket, the share price had peaked at about $1.50 — which was fantastic news for those of us who had been in the stock through the .20s, but still half of what it is today.

Even if we manage to whiff on the Covid play, we’re still far better off than we were at the beginning of the year.

Quote:

“Nader has already put the majority of the CYDY eggs in the Covid basket. Keep in mind Nader is a salesman and promoter. Finishing the details of a BLA is not in his wheelhouse.

BLA has to be farmed our to consultants that understand the process and that costs $. That capital is invested in the Covid play.

I understand the logic in the play as a win will finance the numerous LL indications. It is however a big gamble and the SP reflects the risk.”

[bwolfy2002]

Easy to say in hindsight if the coach should have gone for it on fourth down or not... I for one prefer the field goal or even a good punt.

In NP/CYDY’s defense, hindsight is not fair when attempting to save the world from a pandemic as that sort of a situation never rolls out logically or linearly.

I just think if you’re gonna go for it on fourth down, it shouldn’t be from your own 1 yard line (our financial situation).