InvestorsHub Logo

Chuckles759

10/17/20 12:20 AM

#124032 RE: Mymani #124029

This article is very interesting especially with its commentary.

The CTAP is a very obvious choice....but....

...what could they do with the HIV BLA that already has all the "administrative bureaucratic inertia" started....could they "repurpose" some of the wording in that and push it out the door mosh skosh? Sort of like a "3-Day BLA" ?

Mymani

10/19/20 12:20 AM

#124322 RE: Mymani #124029

7.2.1. DMC Recommendations to Terminate the Study
In almost all cases, a DMC is advisory to the sponsor; the sponsor decides whether to accept recommendations to discontinue a trial. FDA will rarely, if ever, tell a sponsor which decision to make. For trials that may be terminated early because a substantial benefit has been observed, however, consideration may still need to be given to the adequacy of data with regard to other issues such as safety, duration of benefit, outcomes in important subgroups and important secondary endpoints. We recommend that sponsors of trials that could potentially be terminated early for efficacy reasons discuss these issues with FDA prior to implementing the trial, when the statistical monitoring plan and early stopping boundaries are being developed. In these settings, consultation with FDA may provide the sponsor with important information regarding the regulatory and scientific implications of a decision and may lead to better decisions. Sponsors are encouraged to revisit these issues with FDA when considering DMC recommendations for early termination if new issues have arisen and/or if the regulatory implications of early termination were not adequately clarified at the outset of the trial.
For trials that may be terminated because of safety concerns, timely communication with FDA is often required (see, e.g., 21 CFR 312.56(d) (drugs