Replies to post #96751 on Voip Pal Com Inc (VPLM)

[VVVVVV]

They know who’s on their side, so for them, it’s worth a try.

[DeerBalls]

EXACTLY--SPOT-ON!
This is the game the bigs play AND IT SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED!

These new CA cases are just a variation of the bullshit maneuver aapl tried to pull in the "moot" sanctions appeal!!!! Yes different theme, but it costs $/time.... Hey, aapl et al, play these little games and there should be penalties...PENALTIES THAT HURT!!!

Yes, I get so sick of our "system", the delays, the expense! Again, it took Virnetx 10 years to get through with aapl in the first go! How many shareholders X ten years..

How about missy res judicata...play these games and play steep penalties! The missy case should be DONE, but one more step...

How many collective years, # of shareholders who have been here since the beginning of the aapl et al suits x the 3-4 years. Yes, I realize the first set of suits went down, but because we still have claims, those patents are not invalidated! So those patents could still be prosecuted, but how long would that take???

How about some big compensation for the two, year long, IPR trials, WON BY VPLM????

In our system, THE BIGS ARE GIVEN A HUGE ADVANTAGE!!! Shouldn't be!
THEY SHOULD PAY FOR THEIR GAME PLAYING!

Guess the beauty of the missy case is the possibility in a few weeks(the time it will take) is maybe when the 125mm shares COME BACK/COME OUT OF OUTSTANDING SHARES***, maybe the stock price might be much higher...that will add to the fun!

***For those who enjoy the semantic games... THE SHARES ARE FROZEN, WITH NO ONE IN CONTROL OF THEM! The "shares coming back" refers to them coming out of OS.... "Oh, but they aren't really coming back"... WOW, BIG DIFFERENCE!

[rapz]

drumming,
"First to file" Rule
Apple is not THE FIRST TO FILE IN NDCA. Apple CAN NOT BE BECAUSE a criminal does not file first to investigate them for the crime (infringement). It does not make sense.

That is why Apple is using a declaratory judgement from NDCA in lieu of the First to File. Primary purpose is to delay the case in Waco. Mr. Hudnell is ready to challenge clueless Koh.

VPLM is not the First to file in NDCA either. VPLM was the first to file in Nevada against Apple, T, VZ, et al. The case was transferred later due to SCOTUS definition of Venue & Discovery after the TC Heartland case. There is a ton of information (Law Books) on Venue and First to File Federal Rule.

VPLM was definitely the first to file in WDTX. 4 days after Mr. Hudnell filed in Waco, AAPL filed the case in NDCA using the pretext of declaratory judgement.

No VPLM patents will be examined without claim construction. She already ruled Alice twice. What does Koh know about patents and claims? Read about Cisco case ruled Judge Morgan in Virginia. He understood the complex cybersecurity networking algorithms and ruled $1.9 billion against Cisco.

Judge Albright knows all about these laws and has dealt with AAPL's games and forum shopping.