Replies to post #635388 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[RumplePigSkin]

Multi vs single is an important distinction. The Fed is a multi, FCC is another. FFHFA and CFPB are the only 2 singles where they didn’t serve atthe pleasure of potus. CFPB now serves at the pleasure. FHFA TBD on whether it will exist or not.

[Robert from yahoo bd]

RPS is right, Multi member federal agencies ARE allowed under USSCT precedent.

This puts the court in a difficult position with HERA. Should they blue pencil HERA to allow a multi member board to run the FHFA, thus removing the unconstitutionally insulated Single Director that can only be fired for cause by POTUS?

Should they blue pencil HERA by striking the for cause language and add "at will"?

Does the Judicial Branch have authority under Article III of the US Constitution to rewrite Congressional Statutes as the USSCT sees fit, or as the Strict Constitutionalists, Thomas, Gorsuch, and ACB, see it, shouldn't they strike down HERA and let Congress WRITE THE LAWS OF THIS NATION?

The majority in Seila decided it was the duty of the USSCT to save the 1,000 plus page Act, do the least amount of harm, and rewrite the Statute, GUESSING THAT THAT IS WHAT CONGRESS WOULD HAVE WANTED THEM TO DO.

It sends an unfortunate message to Congress, that it's OK TO EXPERIMENT WITH NOVEL FORMS OF CREATING A FOURTH BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT AND INFRINGING ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CITIZENS, BECAUSE DESPITE THE HARM CAUSED AND THE MASSIVE EXPENSE OF LITIGATING A CASE TO THE USSCT, WE WILL SIMPLY REWRITE AND FIX THE CONSTITUTIONAL INFIRMITY.

That it hurts Americans Liberties in the process, NO BIGGIE, RIGHT!