InvestorsHub Logo

daviking1

12/29/06 1:45 AM

#1591 RE: Sptnws #1590

With due respect, you must be getting paranoid. I didn't attack anyone just a general comment about "no comments".
My original question had to do with patents but imo, the company is just selling Electriplast pellets and letting the licensees try to make a product with it. My read on the patents, although not fully understanding, doesn't include making car parts for the one licensee. Please don't interpret that as being negative but a legitimate concern. As I've said before, if ITKG can produce a revenue producing contract worth more than the 2 Bills' salaries, I would consider that a worthwhile look to get back in. My reason for getting out of this stock was that despite the best insinuations by the company (IR - which I talked to many times) and LL's nothing of what had been said came to fruition or verifiable. The $1 license fees are interesting but are somewhat suspect. 50000$ contract for Antennas 5 years ago didn't come about either!!.
Further to the company's focus on patents, IF there are no patents being used by the 3 licensees, and they are only the formula, isn't 2on2's comments about being unable to "patent" the formula have some credibility?
Please enlighten this lost soul!