“And there aren't even close to thousands of companies buying metal AM printers.” Thank You. You keep helping me make my points. I didn’t say just Metal AM printers and yet cameras are used across the whole spectrum of printing. Which means a camera is printer agnostic across more than just metal. Companies like to standardize where ever they can. Especially when it is cost effective.
“And there aren't even close to thousands of companies buying metal AM printers. The printer manufacturers aren't even selling thousands of metal printers globally. The industry is stuck, waiting to get some workable reliability in the build.” If that is the case why would they need Sigma. Why would a company buy a piece of machinery for $1million+ with the knowledge it physically can not consistently make good parts. Then spend $100k+ for software to make the printer overcome it’s physical limitations? Would you buy a $100k automobile and put another $10k worth of air bags into it because you know it has a flaw and it will eventually crash? You may? I’ll wait until the manufacturer or a competitor gets the physical limitations figured out and I don’t to worry about adding the $10k worth of airbags before I buy one, I think most would view it that way.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
