Price of .06 based on only $5m in revenues -- that's a gain of nearly 20 times the current .003! Just think if the revenues are $50m - that isn't at all out of the question, as shown below.
How to get .06?
Only $5m in high margin revenues with VNUE's cost structure could very well yield $3.3m in net income, which is about .003 per share. At a CONSERVATIVE PE of 20 (very conservative for software disrupting an industry), 20 x .003 = .06
The largest note-holder YLimit terms won't allow a conversion below .035. They know the potential here IMO.
Is $5m doable?
According to the last PR, up to $1.7 Billion is collected from radio stations. John Madison said: "Royalties paid to the PROs are one of the largest expenses that a given radio station has," said Madison. "For example, one radio group had annual payments of $300mm alone.".
Then what he said is VERY IMPORTANT: "The detailed data that Soundstr will provide will help reduce these costs anywhere from five to 25%."
Then, what Zach Bair said is also VERY IMPORTANT: "We are initially deploying Soundstr to radio during the beta testing phase at no cost, and anticipate doing the same for the full rollout. This of course creates an easy path for adoption and makes the decision a no-brainer even for the smallest stations. And, as we begin to charge for the service, our cost will not be any type of a barrier."
Being VERY CONSERVATIVE, let's assume only 20% of the stations are willing to pay, and they will pay an avg of 5%, in order to save anywhere between 5 and 25%.
$1.7b x 20% x 5% = $17m in revenues for Soundstr. Remember too that VNUE said SetFM revenues in the first year could be $20-30m And remember that there are several other LUCRATIVE revenue streams for that data -- artists, over 100k venues, labels, partnering PROs -- that aren't even being counted here. And what if half or nearly all of the radio stations are willing to pay in order to save money?
Is $5m in revenues really that much of a stretch?
Doesn't $20-$50m seems more reasonable in time? OR at least $10m?