InvestorsHub Logo

Power of Emouna

09/18/20 4:14 AM

#26202 RE: Filardo71 #26157

If anything even more golden now since court noted Bertagnolli is in favor of appointment of custodianship.

If the parties are both in agreement & in favor of custodianship why would the court not be as well? Think about it! It's pretty much a done deal to me. Bertagnolli simply needs to show up in court on Oct 7 having a lawyer representing him & custodianship should be granted imo. Pretty clear to me! Think about it guys no need to panic & sell. Those selling like throwing a jackpot away! Go $SNVP


https://investorshub.advfn.com/uimage/uploads/2020/9/17/lkdjqClark_County_Court_Acquifin_case5.png

Quote:
Court noted the content of an e-mail received from Mr. Bertagnolli. Argument in support of Petitioner's Application for Appointment of Custodian by Mr. Sawant.


The court is asking to continue the case in October because they want Bertagnolli to be represented. Bertagnolli thought he wouldn't need representation in court because of the e-mail received argument in support of petitioner's application of Petioner's application of appointment of Custodian by Mr. Sawant!

$SNVP