Replies to post #62818 on Seafarer Exploration Corp (SFRX)

[hedge_fun]

my post was a stroke of genius.
(two strokes actually) ;)

If I may, the better post was where you agreed with the premise that finding a wreck site was not needed for Tinkerbell 2.0. That's an interesting theory based on what the company has claimed.

The company submitted this to the USPTO.

Specifically, the SEASEARCHER remotely operated vehicles do not search for sites. Rather, the vehicles are deployed to pre-identified sites. The primary purpose of the vehicles is to collect data at the pre-identified sites. The pre-identified sites are not limited to the seas either.

https://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn88449647&docId=ROA20200226192009#docIndex=2&page=1

Does SFRX not need a research division out ahead of the divers for this grand scheme to work?

If Tinkerbell 2.0 is going to be such an industry changer, and there are claims there are multiple 2.0's being built, won't you need multiple wrecks in the pipeline?

They don't seem to be prepared for WORLD DOMINATION that is suppose to occur by Q1 2021, according to Ware.

Thanks for clarifying.