I would not put a whole lot of importance on the suspected deadline. I believe that Matlin gave a timeframe only because he had to do so in order to answer the question about the audit.
The real question, in my opinion, is whether or not an audit is actually being done. I would feel soooooooooooooooooooo much better if I could just find out that someone was working on it. The excuse of not releasing the auditor's name so they will not be harassed is B.S. For all we know the harassee is just here to provide a ready excuse for the company to keep quiet.
Damn, I sure can think like a paranoid if I try!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
