Replies to post #33155 on Cel Sci Corporation (CVM)

[fluteman]

Droid, aren't we all tired of CVM apologetics?

I hear you.

If I would have dumped my CVM a few months ago, and put it into MGM,
I'd be debt free!!

I put some in MGM a few months ago, and boom!!!

Hindsight, hindsight...lol

[Biobonic]

It’s okay GD

One can just say they are short.

[georgebailey]

@GD-The result of the hold was to continue-thats all we care about and thats what Geert meant.

[Shkreli cellmate]

Not sure if crossing the futility mark regarding efficacy is all true but the statement is a cause for concern, yes - but not sure if its the whole story...(sorry, if this was already addressed - starting dd here). From what i read (not an expert), my crude understanding is:

Cvm - our initial estimate for p3 was wrong and this will take forever... can we increase enrollment??

Fda - why you changing protocol mid trial?
1. Youre putting people in danger
2. If people are not dying.. whats the point?
3. What else have you not told us?

Idmc - just stick with original gameplan and see where it goes.

If cvm changed/amended protocol, this p3 will be futile because they would need to do another p3 for verification.

Imo.. I dont think this has much to do with the data itself but the integrity of the trial if they changed mid trial

[lightrock]

The truth is that this issue corresponded to the day of arbitration proceedings and that the halt was lifted.

As a matter of statistics, if you had been following, the enrollment schedule is also unlikely to be able to show a substantial differentiation at that time; as a natural consequence of the enrollment schedule.

To me it is incredibly obvious what all went down there and also why it was lifted, and never resurfaced.

[staticmirror79]

And comments like THIS right here are why I believe Cel-Sci is only going to be releasing a complete data analysis instead of Top Line Data. They want to have no room for discussion. Shorts argue over and over and over. A complete data analysis will put all of these stupid little arguments to rest.

[Biobonic]

GD you apparently have an agenda

As do most who post here.

You don't listen very well.

He stated 5, 6, 7, 8 9 years 4 months.

Conveniently skipped the first few years.

The pitiful enrollment from the first CRO would not provide enough patients to show a clinical uplift.

You seem angry?!

Cheers!