InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

B52T38

09/01/20 9:18 PM

#113260 RE: SmileyRiley_595 #113259

For Smiley and the rest of you IHUB Kings, what's the informed consensus re: tomorrow's call?

Scenario 1: Approval news?

Scenario 2: Some nation has placed a large order on results to-date?

Scenario 3: Some non-Covid, very positive update?

Scenario 4: Nothing specific, just a progress report on various efforts?

Hoping for Scenario 1 or 2, I miss the double-digit SP of June 30th.

icon url

justdafactss

09/01/20 9:30 PM

#113262 RE: SmileyRiley_595 #113259

Suuuure it is, but, but, NP would announce the good stuff FIRST, then hit shareholders over the head afterwards.

He already stated in a video- if you don't like it...get out.
icon url

PSea

09/02/20 1:58 AM

#113303 RE: SmileyRiley_595 #113259

Have to disagree with this thinking. Recall NP canned BP because he didn't want to pay 5x the cost for his services. How many times should we pay NP for bringing a molecule in house? That's all he's COMPLETED. He hasn't COMPLETED a single thing yet.

If they wanted this and fully intended to use that 100mil share increase to line their pockets, they should have had the backbone to tell us that BEFORE we agreed to increasing the shares.

I think this is being done now because it would never happen with institutional investors on board post uplisting. Not a chance in hell.