Replies to post #199397 on Kraig Biocraft Laboratories Inc (KBLB)

[arachnodude]

Still doesn't answer the question if they are the same sources or different? I guess some just prefer the "air of mystery."

[fastlane]

As far as KBLBs future. What would u say your over all outlook is currently? My biggest fear at this point is they will push more on the US production and less in Vietnam. now that they have achieved pure spider silk. Which will only draw this out longer.

I’ll be happy as long as I’m never in the red again. And we don’t decline much from here. For the most part. I don’t have time to trade and watch everyday. I like that right now I can sell some shares at a small profit at any point if needed.

[want2retire]

You said:

People I know...

Confidentiality docs signed.

Added comfortability.

Added comfortability around what?

Tired of the usury (oh do me a favour) and feelings of being strung along.

Agreed. Feeling like you're being strung along can be very tiring.

COMMON SENSE is telling BIG MONEY to stay away....

PRESENTLY.

Why is common sense telling big money to stay away?

Just stating things in "Kim-like" fashion...

Since it seems to be an agreeable form of expression to the masses.

Doubt people would be asking for clarification if what was provided was clear and deemed agreeable.

“Prior to the consummation of this offering, we will adopt a new code of ethics requiring us to avoid, wherever possible, all conflicts of interests, except under guidelines or resolutions approved by our Board (or the appropriate committee of our board) or as disclosed in our public filings with the SEC. Under our code of ethics, conflict of interest situations will include any financial transaction, arrangement or relationship (including any indebtedness or guarantee of indebtedness) involving the company. A form of the code of ethics that we plan to adopt prior to the consummation of this offering is filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part.”


Why stop now Kim?

Someone pointed it out; being a conflict and he's an attorney....

Unbelievable....

Then again, not really.

Someone pointed what out? What is the "it" that was pointed out? Where did he state there was something pointed out to him that needed to be rectified? Is it uncommon, during an up list application, analysis of a company, etc, for there to be a need to expand upon certain aspects of its existing governance documents, etc?

He is an attorney. Has he broken the law? Attorneys often times have an amazing way of working along the periphery of what the laws/rules might allow. Is this the part that you find unbelievable or something else and, if it is something else, what aspect is it?

Lastly, what do you believe the reverse split ratio will be that will propel the company to NASDAQ?

W2R