This has been addressed so often by now. Interesting point is also: how would the people "trying to protect THEIR ERHC investment" feel about this delay?
In the meantime some true common sense DD has been done by some (like The Doctor, lol) which is seemingly (by lack of any indepth, substantiated rebuttal) hard to directly refute.
I mean: there still is an open question(s) in post 340491, Badog.
Give us your views on the matters now being discussed. Because I'm always craving for REAL common sense! Read my recent posts and try to refute them by using the same indepth common sense...
Or are we going to stick by advanced 'DD' like: "look at the share price" and "It is taking too long for (arguably of course) no reason"?
Doesn't proper DD show us right now that we are right in the middle of something, instead of at the 'end' of a trajectory? Can we apply here: "The stock market is a device for transferring money from the impatient to the patient." - Warren Buffett?
And do you, for example, agree with SSC that:
* You don't have to be a Major shareholder to "call the final shots" at a company... * Even IF you are a Major shareholder, that doesn't mean that you can "call the final shots" at that company... (a simple deduction from the above.) * The ones that are protecting "THEIR ERHC investment", aren't the Major shareholders... * The ones that are protecting "THEIR ERHC investment", are in fact mostly helping other large shareholders... (a simple deduction from the above.) * That group 1 has more indepth information about ERHC than group 2, and that group 1's judgement on the "current state of affairs" of ERHC is more substantiated than group 2's...
Read my recent posts again, and say specific where (if at all) my common sense does not add up, and rebutt it, substantiated. If possible of course, because it is quiet right now, awfully quiet!
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
