I think we all must admit that their modus operandi is MUCH different now then it was in 07/2005 before Katrina. I don't lend much weight to the older PR's now in trying to determine how they do business.
However, I already stand corrected by Castle on the use of restricted for acquisitions. Though it would seem that the new standard since mid-2006 is to limit the usage of restricted for acquisitions and utilize more preferred (Not that I believe that's the best way to structure a deal, but what do I really know).
My only point to Seeclear is that in our frustrations for being 'down and in the dark,' many have resorted to unfounded conspiracy theories of secret financing and back alley deals. Have they happened? I am sure they have at some desperate points. Are they the status quo for how PBLS does business? IMO, no. That's why I park my money here. In fact, this kind of negativity on a real company is a buy signal for me.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
