"Theft" may be theft, although in the case of SEVU, it's not a foregone conclusion. Using your logic, though, I could argue that "speeding is speeding", although I doubt you'll find many radar traps set up 100 miles from the nearest town in the middle of Montana. Morons are morons, although only a qualifying moron would be foolish enough to think the FBI cares about the trash on this board.
As Printmail likes to say, let's be realisic about the class action suit. IF there are enough shareholders who lost a significant amount of money on SEVU, there MAY be cause for a case to determine whether or not SEVU was guilty of anything. All I'm suggesting is that if anyone is relying upon someone who held only a few hundred shares as a "Lead Plaintif", it seems reasonable to question the magnitide of real damages.
If you were a lawyer, and this case is as blatant as some claim, wouldn't you enlist someone with more than a few shares to sit at your bench?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
