InvestorsHub Logo

cowtown jay

08/13/20 10:25 PM

#14436 RE: Engineering_Simple #14434

Not to split hairs, but I really don't think there is a required minimum bid of $3.00. I wouldn't even mention this, but the scenario I'm about to describe closely resembles what we were looking at going into the close, and it illustrates the importance of defining what the $3.00 price means. It might even be relevant tomorrow.

Imagine, in the last seconds of the trading day today, the following spreads:

$2.98 x $3.04

Assume we trade at $2.98, and the spread changes to

$3.01 x $3.04.

The bell rings before we trade.

Even though the bid was $3.01, we would not have met the closing price alternative. The closing price was $2.98. It's the closing price, not the closing bid price, that is considered.

I hope we close above $4.00 tomorrow, and we can forget this discussion about a closing price alternative.

But what if we don't close above $4.00? Or, to turn this into a scary story, what if we don't close above $3.00, either?

What to do, what to do? How do we eliminate the risk of a denial to uplist on NASDAQ?

File the 10-K tonight, or before the market opens. NASDAQ can uplist us based on the closing price alternative.

But if this selling is from a deep-pocketed frenemy, Big Pharma trying to keep us off NASDAQ in order to buy us cheap, they could unleash a tidal wave of selling, forcing our share price to a sub-$3.00 closing price.

A little paranoid, I know. But the 10-K has to be filed either before the market opens, or after the market closes. The alternative is to file an NT 10-K, for whatever good that may do. And I don't know how much longer NASDAQ is going to want to wait.

jb128

08/13/20 11:09 PM

#14443 RE: Engineering_Simple #14434

Lol ES I came to the same conclusion you did after about 5 minutes of reading!

I feel comfortable enough in alll my DD that I’m not going to even bother to figure this one out!

cowtown jay

08/14/20 11:15 AM

#14490 RE: Engineering_Simple #14434

It's interesting, Engr. I think we were both working on our respective posts on this subject at the same time. Neither knowing what the other was doing. I think you beat me to the punch by posting 20 minutes or so in front of me.

So I am curious as to how you and I both concluded that we had to apply for the Equity Standard for uplisting.

So I'll tell you how I came to my conclusion, and if you'd like, you can compare my thought process to yours.

I was looking at Archimedes' analysis from Twitter, which MWM had shared here, which concluded that we had to apply under the "Market Value of Securities" standard. So of course, I was also looking at the NASDAQ Initial Listing Guide. And I didn't think we qualified for the Standard that Archimedes deduced. We didn't trade for 90 days at $4.00 or more, which is required for that standard.

Is that what you were considering in your decision?