Replies to post #811 on Trevena Inc (TRVN)

[Hikiro]

It is fda approval

[GoodGuyBill]

So your point is: The FDA is NOT the Advisory panel. Correct and thanks for the revelation...lol...but I think you're splitting hairs. In any event, I get your point and am glad, after I added details, you know I corrected the issue. Again no intention to mislead or make enemies.

Regarding the vote spread, neither us have any info on that, of course. I am assuming the issue(s) identified by the FDA were resolved by the company before they resubmitted the NDA.

I'm not comfortable defining the motives of TRVN investors...as praying for a lottery... as it implies no forethought or dd. But, that's just me.

Question: Are you a TRVN investor? You're comment wrt TRVN will not win suggest not.

GLTU

Yes it was misleading, you wrote this:

Yes! and don't forget the FDA nearly approved it last time by and 8(no)/7(yes)

Your response to me corrected your misleading post. The committee isn't FDA approval. It's a recommendation. Certainly a negative recommendation is an almost automatic kill shot to approval.

Your survey is incomplete, it doesn't mention spread of the vote, in which I brought up. "We" means investors praying for the lottery on approval. We don't know if all No votes were for the same reason.

In other words, if the FDA went against the committee, what was the spread on those rejections? How many 14-1 approvals were rejected by the FDA? I'm looking at any possible hint on which way it will go.

Good luck.