InvestorsHub Logo

Skiluc

08/02/20 1:03 PM

#129369 RE: Huggy Bear #129367

Fairytale? ARknet is no fairytale my friend... just fairytale like, yep, it’s that good.

Internet for outside. So useful for mind blowing amount of verticals. Entire applications now are simply a feature of ARknet. Process that folks. How many Apps you want on your phone? None of which provide the security of the ARknet. Even safer then going to you banks website... why? Cause your not going anywhere. Your summoning.

https://myarknet.io check out the “fairytale” lol. Download the non-existing “fairytale” and give it a magical carpet ride.

Meantime the awareness growth and continued updates and upgrades are unstoppable.

And finally. Revenue. Coming in Hot!! Revenue ready for exponential growth.

Enjoying my Sunday Afternoon. How is everyone?

Kashkat

08/02/20 1:17 PM

#129370 RE: Huggy Bear #129367

None of that has any bearing on TTCM. Nugent has zero control, he's just a shareholder. $TTCM

PepsiMan

08/02/20 2:40 PM

#129377 RE: Huggy Bear #129367

"What an amazing fairy tale story created by a non disclosing promoter turned scam insider, David LaMountain.

And Michael Nugent and Jon Leonard are long time con artist partners."



100% WRONG. Nugent is not the Founder of Tautachrome. Nugent is not the Founder of KlickZie. Nugent is not the Founder of Arknet. He was the Founder of Roadships which left long ago.

Essentially, if one thinks of the TTCM/RDSH shell as a house it would go as follows: Nugent used to live in the house, but then the house was sold to Jon Leonard. So Nugent no longer has anything to do with the house. The HOUSE is the Stock Symbol $TTCM (Tautachrome) which is owned by all the shareholders.


Jon Leonard and David LaMountain surely are nothing even remotely close to being con artists. Verification of fact are in the filings. Anyone is welcomed to review the documents (all of them with a fine tooth comb) and they will discover the truth. They are completely above board and have been every step of the way.

Tautachrome is a FULLY AUDITED, TOTALLY COMPLIANT company that reports to the SEC. Most Pink Stocks do not have that requirement so everything is scrutinized very carefully. Totally above board once again.


Yesterday the same information was shown to the board and was responded to with a full explanation on each point. That Shitty Woman Reporter (that's putting it mildly as the piece was nothing but garbage to begin with) for the Sun-Hearld is the same woman that was the Girlfriend of the ASIC Investigator LOL! Man you can't make this stuff up and in Court what came out was even more damning! Nothing but a Garbage paper and that woman if she never has been deserves to be fired for such tabloid dribble. Disgraceful that someone would write such childish garbage that can easily be debunked for a supposedly reputable newspaper.

But the business only lasted as long as the Australian Securities and Investments Commission case against Mr Nugent, closing within months of the Queensland Court of Appeal confirming he was guilty of misleading and deceptive conduct over the Cycclone Magnetic Engine. The court ruled that his ''fuel-free'' engine - propelled by magnets - did not and could not work.



That information couldn't be any more inaccurate. The proof came right from the COURT ITSELF LOL.. If they could not work then why would the ASIS INVESTIGATOR HIMSELF TELL THE JUDGE WHEN ASKED HOW ARE THEY TO RECOUP THE COURT COSTS... The response from the ASIC Investigator "WE ARE GOING TO SELL THE ENGINE."!!! It's right in the court record.

HOW CAN ANYONE DAMN WELL SELL SOMETHING THAT'S A FRAUD! It makes no sense even on the face of it. It's twisted and turned upside down. There is technology that can change the way engines are done. Even the Government is not shy from trying to steal. History bears that out where the Government has done just that. Look what happened when Tesla died and they broke into his hotel room and took everything.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from your post:


AS AUTHORITIES pursued him for scamming investors over his fake magnetic engine, playboy and wannabe film director Micheal Peter Nugent was using his growing notoriety to thumb his nose at them, starting another ill-fated business - Conman Clothes Company.

The venture, which included his wife Tammy, was selling T-shirts and skateboards and they cheekily promoted it on a black Chrysler boasting the number plates: CONMAN.

"CONMAN" ... Michael Nugent's cheeky number plate.


But the business only lasted as long as the Australian Securities and Investments Commission case against Mr Nugent, closing within months of the Queensland Court of Appeal confirming he was guilty of misleading and deceptive conduct over the Cycclone Magnetic Engine. The court ruled that his ''fuel-free'' engine - propelled by magnets - did not and could not work.

But it appears the court action didn't deter him. Conman Clothes was just one more business linked to the 48-year-old former Adelaide diesel fitter and mechanic which has been either shut down or put into liquidation owing creditors millions.

At the Playboy mansion.


Since The Sun-Herald's expose´ last week on how Mr Nugent has been living the high life on investors' money - attending pyjama parties at Hugh Hefner's Playboy mansion and travelling extensively around the world without producing anything that works - more investors are claiming they have been duped. They are calling for ASIC and police to conduct thorough investigations into Mr Nugent's extensive business dealings.

Inquiries by The Sun-Herald have now revealed Mr Nugent was a bankrupt in South Australia in the 1980s. His co-director in the engine scam, Steven Vincent Foster, was also a bankrupt until 2007, during the time he was selling shares in the venture.

A closer look at Mr Nugent's company history shows some interesting patterns, particularly with Cycclone Magnetic Engines Pty Ltd. The company, which began in 2002, had three name changes in two years and ended up as Roadships Logistics Ltd, which was liquidated in 2009 owing $1.4 million to unsecured creditors and deregistered.

Another company associated with Mr Nugent, Endeavour Logistics Pty Ltd, met a similar fate, changing its name before being liquidated last year owing unsecured creditors $510,907.40. It had unsecured assets of just $33,168. The liquidator attributed its failure to ''poor strategic management of business'' and ''dispute among directors''.

A creditor who tried to take legal action believes Endeavour was trading while insolvent. Yet ASIC company records show that, somehow, the same liquidated company has been revived as Roadships Freight Pty Ltd. Another company, known as Roadships Limited, which began in 1999, was liquidated and deregistered in 2004. Mr Nugent's bad record stretches back to Adelaide when, after his bankruptcy, his South Australia Redback Trucks Pty Ltd and Max Marmon Pty Ltd were deregistered.

One rusted-on backer of Mr Nugent contacted The Sun-Herald and suggested we had got it all wrong and should look at Roadships Acquisitions Australia Ltd and Roadships Holdings Inc, as investors would reap strong growth with the imminent arrival of ships crucial to its integrated road and sea transport plan. A few checks by The Sun-Herald on the ''partners'' in these projects revealed a different story. Neils Anderson, a Denmark-based shipping broker with Navitaship, appointed to Roadships by Mr Nugent, said no ships had been leased or bought. Dave McMillan, the head of STX Marine, the Vancouver-based company supposedly designing the high-speed ships, said he had not heard from Mr Nugent for three or four years. Another maritime adviser, Mark Yonge, said he was no longer involved.

And a deal to buy the US company Reefco Logistics for $450,000 by March 31 does not appear to have been finalised. The owner of Reefco, Ernie Beaureguard, said he could not comment on whether the deal had been finalised because of ''sensitivities''. Since Roadships Holdings began in 2008, it has made a $2.3 million loss with $2.2 million spent on administration expenses. The company is listed on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board in the US. But the board is considered a listing place of last resort, given it is illiquid and susceptible to market manipulation, and has low levels of supervision and few trades.

Because Roadships has failed to file its quarterly report on time, the public has received a warning about the company. Companies that do not file have an E attached to their ticker code to warn traders. The code for the company is now RDSHE.

Curiously, an investor decided on Wednesday to pay $1.01 for 1584 shares which were only worth 23 cents, and on Thursday an investor paid 75 cents for 600 shares.

Mr Nugent did not respond to questions from The Sun-Herald.

But he has been spotted driving around in his black Chrysler - now without the CONMAN plates.

n.obrien@fairfaxmedia.com.au




____________________________________________________________


That whole bit of information has nothing whatsoever to do with anything. It demonstrates a CON JOB of Gigantic proportions against Nugent LOL. There is so much more information than what has been provided to the board by means of actual documents to show what a complete railroad job occurred.

Most of what is in the quote provided is means absolutely nothing. What is of import that I zeroed on from this story provided has been discussed in depth.


Novagen was Halted for UNTIMELY FILINGS ONLY!




Enough about a company that has zero to do with Tautachrome.



REGARDING TAUTACHROME SPECIFICALLY!


Generally speaking: Where is the scam? Who does this benefit? The guys who loaned Tautachrome Money? Or the Guys that they don't have any relationship with? So if one was to borrow money from a Bank to fund ones operation say, is that person a scam because the Bank let you borrow money? Is that how that works? So are the Capital Markets a Scam? Are the lenders a Scam? So what makes it a Scam? These are reasonable questions generally speaking that any shareholder would want to know as to what explanation one can give to definitively show that it is a scam. Never mind the non-reporting disclosure stuff. If anyone Tweets a stock ticker on Twitter, now they are a non-disclosing promoter? David LaMountain has never been compensated by any company INCLUDING TAUTACHROME IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM FOR ANY STOCK PROMOTION (that has never happened). David LaMountain is NOT a Stock Promoter. It's as simple as that. So are tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of traders now considered non-disclosing stock promoters based on Tweets?

What is needed in a situation like this to 100% definitively make the scam, non-disclosing promoter etc. claim by anyone, is to provide in some way by means of some documentation, some reference, something to back up such a claim. Hypothetically: I could say that I provided x amount of documents to my cousin who is a lead investigator for criminal investigation, but when the documents are also in the public domain (that can be also shown to the public) then if I can't provide such documents it's most generally because I don't have the documentation. None exist. But what I would want to do in such a case like that because it is in the best interests of the public (being public information) is to also post such documentation so all could see. That is a normal function.