Replies to post #10711 on IAHL Corporation (IAHL)

[sparrowman]

Hey pop, Is ed 2.0B in line for the merger????????

[Mr. Ed]

pop and binzur,with this recent news re A/S,you can almost guarantee the o/s has changed,it is why the TA is again gagged,merely history repeating itself.Why else would the TA be gagged?Please be reasonable,and rational in your response,especially considering the exact same thing has been done before by Hayter with this company,lol.

[realest]

POP, what are you talking about.... there is no reason to raise the A/S for a reverse merger. Not only that a reverse merge has the same effect as a reverse split to your share quantities.

A reverse merger means that Company A give 1 share of their common or whatever for each X amount of shares from the old company.

So unless it's a 1 for 1 merger, you get shafted by your hand being cut up by the reverse ratio. It's no better for the shareholders of the other company as thier value gets instantly diluted by your incoming interest. Reverse mergers rarely work out nearly as well as thought would have it.

But you can see it your way. JMO