InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

The ELTP King

07/22/20 4:32 PM

#339327 RE: WeeZuhl #339319

Nasrat said Generic Concerta is now 100% owned by Elite in the CC last month.

Have you seen any SEC filing, press release or anything that confirms this?

Elite's OFFICIAL website still states it's partnered with SunGen.


icon url

WeeZuhl

07/22/20 4:50 PM

#339332 RE: WeeZuhl #339319

so his NJ pharma bro can come by and load them up







I apologize. Farbeit from me to suggest Elite shareholders were not fairly and equitably treated by Nostrum Pharma. I am sure the highest level of ethical deliberation was applied to the transaction.




https://www.ft.com/content/48b0ce2c-b544-11e8-bbc3-ccd7de085ffe


Pharma chief defends 400% drug price rise as a ‘moral requirement’
Nostrum Laboratories’ Nirmal Mulye says he is right to charge as much as possible and slams FDA
David Crow in New York
SEPTEMBER 11 2018

A pharma executive has defended his decision to raise the price of an antibiotic mixture to more than $2,000 a bottle, arguing there was a “moral requirement to sell the product at the highest price”.

Last month, Nostrum Laboratories, a small Missouri-based drugmaker, more than quadrupled the price of a bottle of nitrofurantoin from $474.75 to $2,392, according to Elsevier’s Gold Standard drug database.

Nitrofurantoin is an antibiotic used to treat bladder infections that was first marketed in 1953, which appears on the World Health Organization’s list of essential medicines. It comes in a tablet form as well as a liquid version that Nostrum makes.

In an interview, Nirmal Mulye, Nostrum chief executive, said he had priced the product according to market dynamics, adding: “I think it is a moral requirement to make money when you can and to sell the product for the highest price.”






Thanks for reading. More to come...



icon url

WeeZuhl

07/25/20 10:31 PM

#339715 RE: WeeZuhl #339319

Nasrat decided the bigger risk for our company was being sued for perfectly legal behavior in a highly-regulated business.





Possibly the DUMBEST business decision in the history generic drugs. The companies who were sued were either doing illegal marketing or they were sending millions of tablets to tiny rural counties. Literally, egregious, illegal behavior in a Wild West industry. For one thing, Elite doesn't advertise any of their drugs, so kind of hard to get sued for that. People seem to forget that we were selling hydromorphone since 2010, and methadone since 2012, and oxyIR since ~2015. Did we get sued? Of course not. And the opioid industry is so highly regulated now that every single tablet is accounted for from warehouse to pharmacy to prescriber to patient. It is impossible to do today what those companies did in the 1990's that caused them to be sued.


I hope Elite shareholders will take a minute to read about the opioid lawsuits. The idea that it was a legal risk to our company to sell legal products in a regulated industry is so ludicrous that it is impossible to comprehend. Selling those ANDA's for a fraction of their cost to develop was so unwarranted as to have the APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY.



https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/6/7/15724054/opioid-epidemic-lawsuits-purdue-oxycontin

There are two major legal arguments behind these cases, one against opioid manufacturers and another mainly against opioid distributors:

1) Starting in the mid-1990s, opioid manufacturers unleashed a misleading marketing push underplaying the risks of opioid painkillers and exaggerating the drugs’ benefits. This, the lawsuits argue, adds up to false advertising with deadly consequences by encouraging doctors to overprescribe the pills and getting patients to think the pills were safe and effective.


2) Meanwhile, opioid distributors supplied a ton of these pills, even when they should have known they were going to people who were misusing the drugs. This is backed by data showing that, in some counties and states, there were more prescribed bottles of painkillers than there were people — a sign that something was going very wrong. Federal and some state laws require distributors to keep an eye on the supply chain to ensure their products aren’t falling into the wrong hands. Letting these drugs proliferate, the lawsuits say, violates those laws.