Replies to post #12314 on NanoLogix Inc (NNLX)

[Omar8]

For a test that's totally accurate.......



AS some want others to believe, sure is taking a long time to get a partner for it.

[Omar8]

Exploremore,

Directly from website, clearly on slide 15 of that presentation it's written..."Our novel assay is capable of detecting intact virus( not fragments of the virus), and should not show " re-positives".



"Should not show" is the part that if it's totally accurate then maybe should be changed to DOES NOT instead of should not ?

I believe "should not show" gives room to error and if it errors then that means it isn't totally accurate, why some twist things is amazing.

Has there been any test result anywhere given to back up what it can and can't do ? So until then it's up in the air to what exactly it can do and saying it's totally accurate will be questioned until proof is presented, how difficult is that ? So far no proof has been present anywhere I can find or anyone has shown.