Replies to post #339571 on ERHC Energy Inc (ERHE)

[Krombacher]

No. It is nonsense to suggest that shareholders got "stuck" and are now facing revocation because many in the small group bought shares well after the suspension knowing full well that revocation is a possibility. That is a fact, bro.

I'm perfectly fine with the company going private as are others.

The ones that are stuck are the short sellers. Good luck to them trying to cover after revocation, should it even happen. And it might not happen if the SEC decides that the two judges' gag orders to prevent erhc from disclosing the specifics of the Total DONE DEAL kept them from filing financials is a valid excuse.

If the SEC decides it's a valid excuse then that's the end of the revocation nonsense.

And just because they didn't file the required paperwork to disclose their ownership doesn't make it untrue. They didn't file financials either... and yet a Total deal was done in 2017 per the 400 page court documents.

Krombacher

[Julius Erving]

Maybe you should read back post 339246

That explains everything about ERHC's stakeholders here.

And again, also read: 339541