Replies to post #620006 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[955]

The statement you refer to means the Supreme Court can review the entire conservatorships, not that they will.

Moot point.

And an analysis of their Selia opinion shows that there is no real reason to believe that they will do so.

We've come to a realization there are significant differences between Seila and Collins. Seila doesn't deal with conservatorships/receiverships, so once again your point is moot. Seila deals with smaller private entities who up until now happen to be financial service providers, whereas the FHFA deals with the GSE's who make up 20%+ of the entire mortgage market making them prime targets for politicized malfeasance and indeed have been subjected to hostile takeover for illegitimate purposes.
CFPB was supposed to fix bank shady lending practices, yet we find ourselves headed down the same path as pre-2008. Something wrong with this picture.

In addition, the Collins case does not challenge the conservatorship and the questions put before the Court do not touch on it either.

Serious questions have been raised challenging the validity of the conservatorships. Consolidation of cases has begun. Consolidation without incorporation is socialist by nature undermining SCOTUS's very reason for its existence.