InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Donotunderstand

06/29/20 7:27 PM

#617650 RE: kthomp19 #617648

folks

we will see
icon url

Latergater

06/29/20 8:43 PM

#617663 RE: kthomp19 #617648

Super sticky
icon url

Barron4664

06/30/20 12:26 AM

#617718 RE: kthomp19 #617648

You should maybe read the whole opinion. You keep quoting 1 page out of 105. If you take the context onto account SCOTUS clearly tells us that they can only cut from a statute, thus the reference to a scalpel. They clearly state that they cannot modify words on a statute. So your reply to ano can’t possibly be correct. They cant slightly modify. But they can sever. Problem is if they sever all the provisions of HERA that require or state independence, then the statute becomes nonsensical. The idea that Congress would rather have the FHFA than not can only go so far. COngress clearly didnt mean to redefine the nature of a conservator. So sure FHFA can stay as a regulator but how can the FHFA-C survive if it isn’t independent. That makes a mockery of logic. I think I hear the bulldozers firing up.