InvestorsHub Logo

FastEddie18585

06/29/20 10:49 AM

#617431 RE: 10bambam #617428

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that will be for the lower courts to decided as the case is remanded.

Louie_Louie

06/29/20 11:31 AM

#617465 RE: 10bambam #617428

Why not? The director was installed under a "jurisdiction" that was not legal from the get go.

kthomp19

06/30/20 5:14 PM

#617872 RE: 10bambam #617428

Considering that the FHFA will probably be considered unconstitutionally structured, if so, would/could the previous decisions made by the director be in question? legally?



No. Only the decisions that the plaintiffs (who brought the case over the constitutional defect) challenge are subject to being overturned as a remedy. This is the precedent in Lucia, where the remedy is the incentive to bring the case in the first place.

However, plaintiffs will only get what they ask for, no more. The Collins plaintiffs only challenge the NWS, so an unwinding of it is the most they can hope for. Copycat suits seeking other remedies over the same constitutional violation will all be dismissed.