InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

chrisbaskett

10/11/03 12:03 PM

#7623 RE: SlopsterSlasher #7622

Hey Slop, hope you decide to stick around. Although I would not bet against the info in your post about DNAP being several years out from drug revenue I think we may have a pleasant surprise concerning recreational and forensic DNA projects. DNAP is focussing on rec and forensics because that is where the money is to made by them now. My primary worry at this point in time concerning DNAP becoming a force in personalized medicine is that this stuff is coming on fast. The longer it takes DNAP to stake their claim the smaller that 'steak' will be. JMO and good luck to you!

Chris
icon url

retro

10/11/03 12:08 PM

#7624 RE: SlopsterSlasher #7622

Makes that Exec compensation package even harder to swallow doesn't SS....I know it does for me. During the next run...and it'll come...I'll pull the trigger. I personally feel this band of men and women are walking a fine line between what's rational compensation and what's criminal. Obviously at this time, I lean more towards the latter.

Good luck
icon url

winbig911_

10/11/03 12:47 PM

#7627 RE: SlopsterSlasher #7622

Slopster, have you forgotten that DNAP doesn't need the FDA's approval in other parts of the world ? That's major !
Win.