cowtown_jay, there-was NO LIST of shareholders produced-in SpongeTech case using records, transaction journals, logs, ledgers from brokers and clearing agencies like PENSON, or Olde Monmouth, for example?
Judge relied on a list of shareholders built on a "subscription" basis, from "lucky few" shareholders who subscribed but never received any letter from their broker telling them there was a list to subscribe to? (hence they being the "lucky few"?)
So that means I'M NOT EVEN ON THAT RIDICULOUS LIST?
So how extensive is that "subscription" list? Approx. 1% of the actual REAL amount of shareholders? 2% max?
Wow?
United Statesian must be soooo proud of their 'Justice' system?
Jay CLAYTON will make United Statesian 'Justice' system and SEC and bankruptcy Judges better?
You're asking him a LOT?
United Statesian are the only ones who can actually do something, not those at head positions, they're way too swamped in internal politics/disputes/conflicts?
What are your thoughts about this?