InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

FFFacts

06/19/20 2:13 PM

#615704 RE: kthomp19 #615687

The sentence you quoted is not a fact, it is an assumption, and one with no evidence behind it. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.



"There is no reason for them to do so."
The sentence is not intended as a fact. It is an opinion based on the fact that they did not publicly offer this as a remedy in court. Also, Thompson on one of the conference calls insinuated that there had not been any "settlement" discussions. Furthermore, if there was any hint of a settlement, the appeals likely would not have happened.

icon url

Louie_Louie

06/19/20 5:59 PM

#615782 RE: kthomp19 #615687

Exactly! Take your own advise.
No one has asked for a conversion.
No one has asked for a reverse split.
No one has said JPS has any higher place or benefit then commons while in conservatorship.

The sentence you quoted is not a fact, it is an assumption, and one with no evidence behind it. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Nobody knows what the plaintiffs have asked for in private.